MH

Max Hodak

Things Max Says on Podcasts

Co-founder of Neuralink and now runs Science Corp, on No Priors discussing retinal implants, oncology, and why the brain can't be transplanted.

Where to Find Them

Max Hodak has been a guest on TBPN (3 times) , Y Combinator Startup Podcast (2 times) , Core Memory (2 times) , No Priors , TBPN , Naval , StrictlyVC Download and Moonshots with Peter Diamandis .

Recently: “From Restoring Sight to Reimagining the Brain, with Max Hodak” on No Priors (August 2026); “Max Hodak: How Startups Build Speed” on Y Combinator Startup Podcast (August 2026); “HackingFace, White House $5B AI Science Bet, Travis Kalanick Joins | Veeral Patel, Lin Qiao, Jason Fried, Travis Kalanick, Max Hodak” on TBPN (July 2026); “Out of the Sandbox into the fire” on TBPN (July 2026); “The Future Of Our Brains And Bodies - EP 77 Max Hodak Live Event” on Core Memory (June 2026); “Full Episode: The AI Industrial Revolution” on Naval (June 2026).

What They Said

“I'm going to be ultimately fairly disappointed if I'm murdered by my pancreas.” — Max Hodak, No Priors

Asked why a company building retinal implants would look at oncology, Hodak reframes the entire body as life support. The brain is the one organ that cannot be transplanted even in principle; the heart, liver and lungs are, in his phrase, support characters. The joke is the argument.

No Priors · 2026-08-20 Permalink → Listen →
No Priors Around 26:46 into the episode
Max Hodak

Yeah, so AMD, it's like one in two have some early stage by 80. It's like one in 10, 85 that I actually have it. It is definitely a major issue, and not just vision, but these topics in general affect everybody. We don't have firm pricing yet. This is a thing that we are being a little cautious about how we talk about publicly because we aren't totally sure yet. But the precedents for vision are all, I mean, I think we could say they're expensive. I mean, Second Sight 10 years ago, they so there's a company about a decade ago that had a retinal prosthesis that works differently than ours does. It did not get the type of performance that Prima does, but was briefly approved because, again, there's really nothing for these patients. There's always been a lot of enthusiasm for anything that could possibly help them. And they didn't get what we call form vision. They didn't get like a coherent face or like paragraph that your eyes could scan over. They got these flashes of light that patients could look at and kind of think about assembling into what they meant. They got paid about $150,000 per patient in the mid-2010s. There's a gene therapy that works that is only relevant in the first place for about 5% of patients in one narrow indication. And it really doesn't work that well. It gets 0.1 lines of improvement. It kind of slows the rate of degeneration for some patients. That reimburses at almost half a million dollars per eye. And so there's, I mean, some of this is a function of just how expensive it is to develop these therapies and how high the failure rate has been historically. And then some of it is that there's just, it is, I mean, vision is a very dominant sense for us. If you lose that, that's totally debilitating and restoring it is very important, even just like minimal vision. So the. The TAM will grow over time. For this first version, it's on the scale of like hundreds of thousands of patients in the U.S. and Europe. So, for the current version of Freema, it's probably hundreds of thousands of patients. And then the next version, which is going into animal studies now, will be in humans hopefully next year, should expand that to millions.

Sarah Guo

You said something that surprised me as an intermediate point between vision and fully understanding consciousness. How does oncology or other, like, how do other indications fit into the picture in terms of what you might work on?

Max Hodak

I mean, the thing that makes you the only organ that you can't even, in principle, transplant is the brain. The heart, the pancreas, the liver, the lungs, as far as I'm concerned, they're really support characters. They're there to keep the brain activity interesting and going. And I think we're going to get to a point where, because the biology is so difficult, I mean, you've got this like alien nanotechnology that is around us that we are like completely surrounding us that we are completely dependent on that we understand still very poorly. Instead of needing to solve that, are there ways where we can accomplish the same fundamental goals, you know, like using a toolbox that humanity is much more advanced in? And so, I'm going to be ultimately fairly disappointed if I'm murdered by my pancreas. And that I think that's that's the worldview. It's that the thing that matters is the brain. The brain is the computer that gives us this. You could not, we talk about being a brain in a vat or having like these upload thought experiments, but you already that's what the skull is. Like the brain is connected to the environment through a small number of wires, the cranial and spinal nerves. The optic nerve is nerve two, the vestibular cochlear nerve that carries hearing imbalance is nerve eight. You've got these little cables that carry your interaction with the world. That world is generated by the brain. And so, if you can get visual, the visual signal, auditory signal, balance motor, like somatosensory motor in and out of the brain, that is an end in itself. That is the central object. And through a mix of the BCIs that allow you to kind of change the thing that it's interacting with, and our perfusion medicine program, we think that there's ways to significantly improve not just lifespan, but health span and kind of create a better, better quality of life for many patients in ways that I think will feel kind of like a lateral move rather than just solving many of the things that people have seen on the horizon.

Sarah Guo

For people who are interested in working at or investing in science, if you are successful, you know, what will be the change the human experience 20 years from now, besides you not worrying about your pancreas as much?

Max Hodak

Yeah, I mean, that's it. Like, that's the, there's the, there's a sense, like a fragility that we all live, like there's this jeopardy that we all live under as part of the human condition. And I think that if we're successful, what will happen is that sense of jeopardy will fade. Like we will be, we will just become much less fragile. We will have the ability to upgrade and replace parts of ourselves. So, neurodegeneration, we don't know about that. One still seems, that's still difficult. That still needs like real investment. The two leading causes of death, though, are cardiovascular disease and cancer not metastasized to the brain. And I think both of those are going to be really attackable through this type of work. The other extreme is if we're serious about exploring the universe and going to the stars, we are going to have to adapt ourselves to that environment. We're not going to export Earth with us everywhere we go. And these bodies are great, but they're designed for this planet. And it is going to be adapting ourselves to the hard vacuum space is definitely going to be, I think, the thing that we want to do in the long run. And ultimately, those are the same project.

Sarah Guo

Being able to preserve yourself and being able to adapt yourself. Swappable parts and substrate

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode
“Well, if you want to make people angry, you should tell the internet that the brain is a computer.” — Max Hodak, No Priors

Sarah Guo had just asked how the clinicians he works with react to his premise. Hodak co-founded Neuralink and now runs Science Corp, where that assumption is doing real work rather than rhetorical work — the implants only make sense if it holds. He treats the backlash as weather, not as an argument to be won.

No Priors · 2026-08-20 Permalink → Listen →
No Priors Around 08:07 into the episode
Max Hodak

Yeah, I mean, in the clinical trial, I mean, the main thing was just the existence proof of like that success was impossible outcome, right? Like that you had patients filling in Sudoku puzzles or crossword puzzles. There were patients that were reading books. And so I saw some of these patients, some of these videos, met with one of the patients, talked to the surgeons. I mean, this is one of those things that seems too good to be true. How did

Sarah Guo

clinicians react to all of this? Like, do, would, would the people that you work with say at the beginning, like, yes, Max is right. Like, the brain is a computer. This should definitely work. It should work at a higher likelihood and better rate of progression than our random walk and biological understanding.

Max Hodak

Well, if you want to make people angry, you should tell the internet that the brain is a computer.

Sarah Guo

Okay.

Max Hodak

Start by

Sarah Guo

doing that. All right.

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode

Collections They Appear In