Greg Casar

Things Greg Says on Podcasts

Where to Find Them

Greg Casar writes Daniel Biss for Congress . They have also been a guest on Squawk Pod (3 times) , On with Kara Swisher (2 times) , Zeteo , Question Everything , Thinking about... and Mehdi Unfiltered .

Recently: “What’s Next For AI Regulation After Dems Sweep? Reps. Casar and Liccardo Weigh In” on On with Kara Swisher (November 2026); “Now We Act: With Rep. Greg Casar on Passing Great Laws” on Thinking about... (November 2026); “'Best Shot Of My Entire Life' Of Flipping Texas Blue, Says Rep. Greg Casar” on Mehdi Unfiltered (November 2026); “‘Best Shot Of My Entire Life’ Of Flipping Texas Blue, Says Rep. Greg Casar” on Zeteo (October 2026); “The A.I. Populist” on Question Everything (October 2026); “What Pablo Torre Found Out & Banning Artificial Superintelligence 9/4/26” on Squawk Pod (September 2026).

What They Said

Kara Swisher asked Rep. Greg Casar about his AI bills. This is his example for a bill to ban AI-driven personalized pricing, sometimes called surveillance pricing.

On with Kara Swisher · 2026-11-09 Permalink → Listen →
On with Kara Swisher Around 12:59 into the episode
Speaker 1

…think that you should have to pay higher electric bills for these guys, or our national security should be compromised. So, it really, I think, is going to be about taking a side and then passing meaningful legislation, in my view, to protect your jobs, to reduce your bills, protect your safety.

Kara Swisher

Greg, you have a couple of bills. One is the displacement of workers. The other is a ban on artificial superintelligence you sponsored along with Bernie Sanders in the Senate. Can you just give more specifics about these and where you think they are in terms of voter interest?

Speaker 1

I'll start with our ban on superintelligence bill. It basically says we should not develop AI that is too powerful for humans to control. And if you remember, when Senator Sanders came out against unregulated data centers, people were like, that's some way out there progressive idea. Now it's the mainstream of American politics. Similarly, here, you know, this idea of like, why should we develop AI that could develop a bioweapon without our authorization? I mean, who wants that? That's nuts. We shouldn't be allowed to do that and we should have it under control. On jobs, I've developed a tax proposal that disincentivizes AI companies from getting rid of your job and getting a tax break for it. Instead, they should pay a meager tax that increases if unemployment increases to make it so that we don't wind up in a situation where you've got structural mass unemployment. We should be able to develop our technology in a way that benefits people, but not in a way that puts lots of people out of work. And then I'll add a third one real briefly, Kira, that is like this simple affordability stuff. I have a bill, and Ruben Gallego has in the…

Kara Swisher

So Sam, talk about it from a California perspective. Obviously, California has been one of the states that's governed it more than other states, obviously. But it has to be a federal thing. How do you look as a legislator from California? How do you look at what has to happen in AI and what is…

Speaker 3

Yeah, I think, you know, as you discuss all the issues, and I would never

Speaker 1

minimize the jobs issue because I think that's going to be a massive disruption to our economy. We have to confront it. But I think the most urgent issues we have to focus on are around AI safety because the cybersecurity risk, the loss of control risk, what we've already seen with the gentleman…

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.

Collections They Appear In