Indy Johar

Things Indy Says on Podcasts

Using Substack as a space to explore ideas that are still forming—ideas I’m not yet entirely comfortable with, and whose consequences I don’t fully understand. I’m writing to think, not to convince. - Prof @RMIT

Where to Find Them

Indy Johar writes Provocations , writes The Great Simplification and writes 10x100 . They have also been a guest on The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens (2 times) and This is Precious . They also write for Expanding Civilizational Optionality and Indy Johar on Substack.

Recently: “Optionality Collapse: We're Investing in a Future That Won't Exist” on The Great Simplification (October 2026); “Optionality Collapse: We're Investing in a Future That Won't Exist with Indy Johar” on The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens (October 2026); “A Wild chat with Indy Johar on preparing our world for what’s coming” on This is Precious (July 2026); “Securing Tomorrow: Why Continuity — Not Resilience — Must Become the Organising Principle of Our Economies” on Provocations (May 2026); “When the Horizons Collapse” on 10x100 (March 2026); “Towards Public Interest Digital Intellectual Property” on Provocations (January 2025).

What They Said

“I would argue that most of our financial accrual of wealth has been built on that predictability and the exploitation of that predictability. And so, the problem is that all of our theories of alpha don't exist. I think they've already gone. We just don't know it.” — Indy Johar, The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens

Johar argues that modern institutions and finance were built on an unusually predictable period of climate, energy supply and demographics, which is now ending. He tells capital allocators that projections modelling these as separate, linear systems miss how they now feed back on each other.

The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens · 2026-10-14 Permalink → Listen →
The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens Around 07:46 into the episode
Indy Johar

…on the macro level, moving and moving outside those zones of predictability at the climatic sense. But also, we're now fundamentally moving outside the predictability in terms of our demographics, our energy supply. All of this infrastructure is now winding into a period of systemic volatility.

Nate Hagens

So, our entire financial system, our institutions, our expectations, our prices, our incentives were based on an unbelievably stable period of history, both ecologically, because we have more energy every single year. That's been stable as well. And demographics. And demographics as well.

Indy Johar

I would argue that most of our financial accrual of wealth has been built on that predictability and the exploitation of that predictability. And so, the problem is that all of our theories of alpha don't exist. I think they've already gone. We just don't know it. And so, when I sit in rooms and people talk about product replacements, replacing one thing with another, and I'm like, well, what I don't yet understand is if we have a major labor cognition collapse, we don't necessarily have the value of the labor distribution in the economy. So, the demand collapses simultaneously very quickly, and violence kicks off. So, all these predictions of copper and…

Nate Hagens

How many are seeing it or even suspecting it?

Indy Johar

Privately, individuals are. I think the challenges, and this is where I think family officers have a strategic advantage because they're unencumbered capital. Coded capital, I think, is the is unfortunately in the worst. Well, I don't know what that means. Um, funds, pre-structured funds, funds…

Nate Hagens

Let me double-click on something you said before. You mentioned alpha. And I think there's two aspects of that that I'm curious about. One is to a planet that is only recently becoming self-aware, what is the alpha that we should be measuring? That's one question. And second, the narrow boundary…

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode

Collections They Appear In