This closes a run of argument about a doomer post that had prompted talk of pausing training, with Ravenwolf pointing out that nothing came of an earlier warning. The conditional at the end is the actual claim: the bet only pays off if the technology is widely distributed. Alex Volkov cut in to say they could feel a whole debate coming, and Chris Alexiuk picked up the distribution thread straight after.
Did you hear anything that anything happened after that came out? Nothing, right? Nothing. And
the world didn't end.
My P doom for AI is much less than my P doom for humans. If you look at the world where humanity has gone without AI, I think we should risk the chance that with AI we will get something better if it's widely distributed.
All right, folks, I think we could feel a whole debate.
Anti-democratic views and the healthiest thing you can have is an ecosystem. So a monoculture is bad in any ecosystem, whether silicon or organic-based. And still, encryption works. If you want it to work, it does work. And that's the main tool we have. If we distribute it and we're able to have…
All right, folks, I think we've covered this thing enough. There's plenty of stuff to cover in the big war, big labs, but we will keep monitoring. We'll let you know if anything major happens there. I think we'll skip Apple's event that has nothing to do with AI. The only few things about the Apple…