JB

Julian Barnes

Things Julian Says on Podcasts

Where to Find Them

Julian Barnes has been a guest on The Bulwark .

Recently: “Trump’s Favorite Tech CEO Caught in Chinese Spy Sex Scandal” on The Bulwark (November 2026).

What They Said

“Jensen Huang was not given a defensive briefing so far as we know. The FBI did not pull him in and say, look, this woman you're having a relationship with is a Chinese spy. She is an intelligence asset. So the question is, why didn't they do it?” — Julian Barnes, The Bulwark

The host asked what the US government knew and when. Barnes laid out what is known and said the missing piece is why no one warned the Nvidia CEO, listing possible reasons such as wanting to keep collecting intelligence.

The Bulwark · 2026-11-10 Permalink → Listen →
The Bulwark
Julian Barnes

She's a Chinese national.

Catherine Rampell

…know about when the Trump administration, when its suspicions arose and why it, I don't know if it, I don't know if looking the other way is the right way to phrase this, but why it doesn't seem to have intervened. And the president continued to have a pretty close relationship with Johnson Huang.

Julian Barnes

These are really good questions, very important questions to us, I'm sure to the Wall Street Journal and the FT and all other journalists pursuing this. What we've offered our readers right now are two concrete data points. One, October 2025, the president is briefed about this intelligence that Jensen Wong has a relationship with a Chinese Spy. We have offered our readers the other data point of this spring, Marco Rubio authoring a memo, highly classified to a select group of White House officials that Alice Wong was an operative of the Chinese Ministry of State Security and had a relationship with Jensen Wong. Obviously, you know, the New York Times, Bloomberg, and others start reporting about Mega Speaker. Of speed last year. The government is looking at it at that time. But exactly when the U.S. learned Alice Wong was a spy, we don't know yet, right? And another key question is: Jensen Wong was not given a defensive briefing so far as we know. The FBI did not pull him in and say, Look, this woman you're having a relationship…

Catherine Rampell

I want to play for you an exchange in which Donald Trump was asked about what he knew and why he didn't respond any earlier.

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.
“Every spy agency in the world uses this. It's the stuff of spy novels because it is a technique that works. … A CEO of an American technology company, no matter who it is, should expect to be a target of industrial espionage.” — Julian Barnes, The Bulwark

The host asked how common honey traps really are, given that officials believe that is what happened to the Nvidia CEO. Barnes said the technique is tried and true and that anyone controlling critical technology should be warned they are a target.

The Bulwark · 2026-11-10 Permalink → Listen →
The Bulwark
Julian Barnes

…Alice Wong was trying to either gather information or influence Jensen Wong. So we have not seen the transcripts. We are not going to see the transcript of these intercepted calls. That is the most classified intelligence the U.S. has. But this is the kind of place that this information comes from.

Catherine Rampell

I'm just curious, how common are these kinds of honey traps, if in fact, intelligence officials think it was a honey trap?

Julian Barnes

Look, every spy agency in the world uses this, right? Like, you know, it's the stuff of spy novels because it is kind of a technique that works. Like middle-aged man, like young. Intelligence officer, like it's a way to get information, and it's kind of tried and true. If you are the CEO of a world-leading company, if you are the person with access and control over the most important technology in the world, you know, your people should explain to you that you are a target, not just of the Chinese intelligence, but of intelligence agencies around the world. Like, this, you know, a CEO of an American technology company, no matter who it is, should expect to be target of industrial espionage.

Robbie Whelan

I would also add to that that Alice Wong, from what we know about her, does not seem to be your typical kind of, you know, your typical honey trap, I guess. She's not, she doesn't, she was actually the CEO of a legitimate company that was spun off from a company backed by Alibaba. She seems to have…

Julian Barnes

an important point, right? Because we do not know exactly when Alice Wong was recruited here, right? So Alice, it's important to understand that, like, let's take the Red Sparrow novels there, right? Like, the person doing the honey traps in those novels is a Russian case officer, right? They were…

Catherine Rampell

it's a Singaporean company. Is she a Singaporean national or a Chinese national?

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.
“China has effectively a back door: using companies in Southeast Asia to let its companies train its models. If you can get access to a data center in Malaysia or Singapore, Alibaba and other companies can kind of catch up. They can get around the restrictions that the U.S. has in place.” — Julian Barnes, The Bulwark

The host asked why US chip export controls exist. Barnes explained the original aim of keeping a lead over China and how Southeast Asian data centers let Chinese firms work around it, context for the Nvidia chip-smuggling probe.

The Bulwark · 2026-11-10 Permalink → Listen →
The Bulwark
Robbie Whelan

…him, it would have enormous implications for the broader AI race between the U.S. and China. It would also run counter to or would complicate several years of policy coming out of Washington. Limiting how much hardware NVIDIA can sell in China so as to avoid falling behind in the AIA race.

Catherine Rampell

Julian, that's what I wanted to ask you about. We have these current export controls, right, on some of the kinds of chips, the most advanced frontier chips that NVIDIA is responsible for. Why do those export controls exist in the first place?

Julian Barnes

Well, I mean, export controls kind of began in the first Trump administration and then were doubled down in the Biden administration as they Biden administration officials would talk about a small garden with high walls. They would say, like, look, on the most important chips, and we're talking about NVIDIA's black wells here, you want to make sure that China doesn't get them, right? This is all about keeping the U.S. lead, six months to nine-month lead, and potentially extending it. NVIDIA publicly says that they don't want China to have to be to there be a delay before China gets the most advanced chips. But, you know, NVIDIA has not been a company that has been wonderfully enthusiastic about export controls here. And they felt that the Biden administration was way too tight and way too restrictive on who they were selling their chips to. NVIDIA exists to sell chips, as many chips as they can to as many people as they can. And so that's the issue here, right? Like, if you're going to keep an edge, you need the people who have the most compute, the most black wells…

Catherine Rampell

Julian, what is the strongest evidence that we have at this point that Alice Wong was working for Chinese intelligence?

Julian Barnes

So it's important for everybody to understand, like, we are working in the world of intelligence, and we are not talking about evidence, right? It's not a court of law. Now, what NVIDIA's board in their investigation might be able to find out might be interesting. They might be able to look at…

Catherine Rampell

I'm just curious, how common are these kinds of honey traps, if in fact, intelligence officials think it was a honey trap?

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.

Collections They Appear In