Jordi Visser

Things Jordi Says on Podcasts

Macro investor with three decades on Wall Street, formerly president and chief investment officer of Weiss Multi-Strategy Advisers; now runs Visser Labs, advising investors on AI and digital assets. Writes the Jordi Visser Macro-AI-Crypto newsletter and is a frequent guest on The Pomp Podcast, discussing markets, AI, and Bitcoin.

Where to Find Them

Jordi Visser writes Jordi Visser Macro-AI-Crypto Substack , hosts Raoul Pal: The Journey Man and writes The Market House . They have also been a guest on The Pomp Podcast (83 times) , TFTC: A Bitcoin Podcast (4 times) , From the Desk of Anthony Pompliano (4 times) , Capital Allocators – Inside the Institutional Investment Industry (3 times) , Coin Stories with Natalie Brunell (3 times) , Forward Guidance (2 times) , The Milk Road Show (2 times) , The Wolf Of All Streets , Bitcoin Magazine Podcast , Bloomberg Intelligence , Bits + Bips , Milk Road AI , Wealthion - Be Financially Resilient , Inflection Point , Bankless , What Bitcoin Did and Unchained . They also write for Jordi's HRV Substack on Substack.

Recently: “AI Slop, Bitcoin, and the Price of Intelligence” on Jordi Visser Macro-AI-Crypto Substack (October 2026); “Is Bitcoin About to Shock Everyone in Q4? | Jordi Visser” on The Pomp Podcast (October 2026); “How AI Could Take Bitcoin to $1 Million | Jordi Visser” on What Bitcoin Did (September 2026); “Bitcoin's iPhone Moment Will Trigger Wall Street FOMO | Jordi Visser” on The Pomp Podcast (September 2026); “#795: Tokenization Unlocks $900 Trillion in Wealth with Jordi Visser” on TFTC: A Bitcoin Podcast (September 2026); “When Wealth Becomes Money: Why Crypto Matters For Economists” on Jordi Visser Macro-AI-Crypto Substack (September 2026).

What They Said

“If you go to wire money to someone on a Friday at three o'clock, it'll settle on Monday. Where's your money for the last two days? Where's it sitting? And I challenge anyone to actually know where their money is.” — Jordi Visser, The Pomp Podcast

Visser was making the case that AI agents will need payments that settle instantly. His argument is that every step and every second between buying and settling is a chance for a swarm of agents to steal the money along the way, which is why he expects crypto rails to become necessary.

The Pomp Podcast · 2026-10-03 Permalink → Listen →
The Pomp Podcast Around 29:34 into the episode
Jordi Visser

So I have one for A. Man,

Anthony Pompliano

you capitalist pig. You going after the middle managers? Too

Jordi Visser

much time in Morgan Stalin. So one side has got an AI side. The other side has a crypto side. And I send them out to keep up on what's going on. What Muse did for me, and I think this is what people need to hear when they go, Meta one. Meta didn't win anything. It's not even like there's, there's going to be so many personal AI. And that's the big thing. And that's why it matters so much is that when Apple comes out, we're going to have a ton. And who do I think is going to be better at security, Apple or Meta? I'm going to go with Apple. It's just my guess. But regardless of that, Muse and all of them, if you haven't used them yet, I think you're missing the same way that when we talked about not understanding tokens, you're going to miss out on some activity to invest. I think with agents, then my brain only goes one place, which is there's no way for the current system to handle the speed and the ability to do things like this. It's just impossible. And I will give you one important thought process on this. So we've heard about agent swarms. So let's take the two parts of agents. The reason there's agent swarms now is the same reason that we have personal agents. We couldn't have personal agents unless we got to the point where we had agent swarms. Because at the end of the day, that's kind of what you're doing. You need to have enough IQ to be able to do all these different tasks, have the memory, have it, and agent swarms have the same thing. The reason this is important, the current system, when you go to wire money to someone, if you go to wire money to someone on a Friday at three o'clock, it'll settle on Monday. Where's your money for the last two days? Where's it sitting? And I challenge anyone to actually know where their money is. When they use a credit card to go buy something and it goes from your bank account to the merchant through the credit card, I keep hearing people tell me, well, V's and MasterCard are going to be the winners in this. I'm like, no, they're not. They have no chance. I don't even know where this comes from. And this argument comes up all the time. The amount of steps between buying something and settling something, the longer it takes, even if it's 20 seconds versus one second, that's multiple times for an agent swarm to come in and steal the money along. You need every single part of it. So you remember the cold wallet story, right? Crypto is based on cryptography. Like this is going to be a necessity to make sure that it's instant because that is the best defense on anything. If you're worried about someone robbing your house, but they only rob it when you're not there. Well, the best thing would be to go outside for a second, come back in. The longer you leave, you go on vacation, the higher the probability. I think people need to start understanding that the lineup of cryptography to AIs is not just about them wanting to do things fast. It's not just the cost. It is also the time of risk against agent swarms. And I think that's going to become more of a story. This is the reason why every time I use it, I'm like, oh my gosh, this is so obvious that number one, we didn't need crypto. We didn't need the tokens. We didn't need the altcoins. We needed the layer ones to kind of draw capital in to build out the infrastructure that was necessary. So when you have the L1s growing and continuing to get bigger and bigger, well, that means the ecosystem is getting bigger. And as Michael Saylor says, the capital structure can now change because we actually have digital collateral. We have Bitcoin. We have Ethereum. So we have the programmable side. But you need that thing that actually makes it, well, this is the use case. And I said the same thing. If you go back and look when Uber started, Uber didn't start as a company in terms of the idea until the App Store happened. Then they went, oh, we can do this. So I think you're going to see innovation after innovation related to this. So what I've spent my time on as someone who listens to so many podcasts a week. Very seldom now do I listen to moonshots. Very seldom do I listen to any of these. They've been dominated by crypto now and not rah-rah hoodie crypto. I mean the functional use cases and different ways to value these because I am getting constantly, I mean, this has happened three times this week. Calls with hedge fund and asset manager, let's just say asset managers. Tell me about why I should be investing in crypto. These conversations never existed. When you and I talked, you gave me all the horror stories of walking into rooms.

Anthony Pompliano

They are asking you in terms of, I hear you talking about crypto and I disagree, so convince me. Or they are saying, I am interested. Help me better understand where to put the money that I want to invest. Yeah.

Jordi Visser

The best analogy is the door was closed and you had to pry it open. They're looking through the door. I see. They're interested. And the reason is, and this is the Wall

Anthony Pompliano

Street FOMO building up.

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode
“…If you listen to economists, you are going to lose money.” — Jordi Visser, The Pomp Podcast

Visser drops this near the end of a long answer on why rising rates will not damage the AI trade the way they once damaged a housing-and-autos economy. He frames it as something he has said repeatedly, and immediately explains what he means: the error is extrapolating past cycles into a period where demand and margins do not behave the way the models assume.

The Pomp Podcast · 2026-09-05 Permalink → Listen →
The Pomp Podcast Around 01:31 into the episode
Jordi Visser

I believe from an Elliott Wave perspective, we're entering a third wave, a big, the most powerful wave in crypto. For that to happen and the reasons behind it, we need this kind of doubt when it starts to go up because the energy that should be associated should be real. For this to be a third wave, I also need the silent IPO thing to be there. I needed to see.

Anthony Pompliano

What's going on, guys? Today we have a great conversation with Jordy Visser. In it, we talk about interest rates, why everyone's worried about them going higher, but maybe it's not actually going to affect the economy or your portfolio as much as you think. We talk about Bitcoin and whether it's going higher, lower, or going to stay the same, why people are so bearish, but Jordy is so bullish. And then we talk about AI agents and what's going on changing in the way we work, the way that we live our lives, and how it is going to impact everything around us. This conversation has a ton of impact on what is actually going to occur in your portfolio and the U.S. economy over the coming years. I highly suggest that you listen to this very carefully, and I think that you'll get a lot of value out of it. Here's my latest conversation with Jordy Visser. All right, Jordy, we're back in studio. You got a Hawaiian shirt on. I got a Yankees hat. We're ready to rock and roll. Everyone has one big question. Are interest rates going to go up or are they not? Scott Bessant this week gave an interview and he said, I have more information than the market has, obviously. How are you analyzing whether rates will go up or not? And then what is the impact of them changing?

Jordi Visser

All right. First of all, and I did post some stuff in X and I'm going to do some stuff in the video for the weekend. Your question aligns with the way people are freaking out. Personally, I'm shocked for, let's just use tenure rates. For the most part, they've been stuck in a 50 basis point range for the last almost four years since the peak in 2022 or the peak since they started to range trade. Rates should be going higher because nominal GDP is over 6% and nominal GDP is over 6% because of the AI trade, which is all related to the build out of the AI trade. I don't think people should be focused on whether rates are going up or not. I think the question is, will rates do anything to the economy? And number two, and most importantly, the administration and Scott Besson have shown their hands that they don't want rates to go higher. And regardless of the reasons, he's not going to publicly go out and say, well, we're really focused on the fact that the deficit's big. And if we let rates go higher, then our interest expense is going to be higher and we're going to be in worse of a debt situation. I think the more important thing for people to think about again is will rates of this magnitude, this is not a big move. So will rates making this scary 20-year high, which is the chart that everyone shows around and that all the people that believe in the end game that Druck and Miller wrote about, which is you're manipulating a yield to where it should be and it should be higher. So I agree with that. What I don't agree with is that people should sell stocks because of that or that they should be thinking that something bad is going to happen. And the reason is there is no sensitivity to rates with inside the AI build out. And I'm going to show that this weekend too. The margins for the frontier models, which are Anthropic and OpenAI, which are really the drivers of the entire thing at this point. So users are using ChatGPT and Anthropic. They've become a duopoly. And yes, you have open source, but these are the companies that the enterprises are using. These are the ones that are able to charge the prices they're charging. Their margins are enormous and interest rates have almost no impact. So I'm going to show with the work of Claude and ChatGPT with Gemini as my fact checker and then using them all as my fact checker that a 200 basis point rise in 10 year yields doesn't change the margins for Anthropic or OpenAI by very much. It's about from, let's say, 70% to 69%, 200 basis points. This is the first time that this has gone on. So part of this fear over rates is the history of an economy that was driven by housing and was driven by autos and the great financial crisis. So again, I've said this repeatedly. If you listen to economists, you are going to lose money. If you listen to people who take the past and extrapolate it into a time with exponential demand where margins are infinite, I mean, they're as high as they can be. And the demand side is never ending because we barely have started. And the advancements in Grockbot mean more usage. Astra, which hasn't been released to us yet, but you read through X, like everything is going to continue. And I'll leave it with one more thing. I was listening to a podcast today, and basically the way they're talking about it at Open AI and Anthropic is in the next year, we will basically have about four years of model capability improvements. Now, the reason that's important is so everyone realizes that four years is equating to going from Chat GPT's original launch to Astra. And now we're talking about next year that's going to happen. So this is all about AI agents. This is all about consumer agents. This is all about enterprise adoption. This is all about profit margins. And rates are just not going to be as important as they've been in the past. So that's my angle on rates at this point.

Anthony Pompliano

All right. So let's say that you are right, which I do, I do believe that you are correct in that if rates go up 200 basis points, you're not going to see a significant change in the profit margins of the large AI companies. Great. The AI companies maybe employ tens of thousands of people. Maybe we get to 100,000 if you kind of expand the definition of the large language models. There are 300 plus million Americans. There's still the housing market. There's still, you know, business loans and RD and growth of all these other economies, et cetera. Why do you think that the only thing that really matters is the AI companies, as if rates go up, then AI companies aren't affected and therefore the economy isn't kind of held back.

Jordi Visser

So when I say the only thing that matters, again, I'm saying you're not going to take nominal GDP to go down far if rates go from four and three quarters to five and a quarter. Now, again, the administration doesn't want that to happen. Do I think investors could freak out? Sure. And I think we've already seen that. I think we've seen the SP 500 multiple come down this year.

Anthony Pompliano

So just to make sure that maybe let me repeat this back. What you're saying is if rates go up 150, 200 basis points, asset prices could fall. Other parts of the economy could slow down or feel pain. But the main driver of GDP growth right now is the AI companies. And if the AI companies are insulated from the rate increase, then you're saying GDP basically is going to be untouched by increases in rates, unlike how it has been in the past.

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode
“Bitcoin needs to be in people's portfolio because it is a hedge against abundance.” — Jordi Visser, The Pomp Podcast

This is the cold open, a clip lifted from later in the conversation and used to lead the episode ahead of Pompliano's introduction. Visser's argument is that if AI delivers the abundance its backers promise, the thing worth holding is the asset nobody can make more of. He follows the line by saying his practice is to stay quiet on Bitcoin until the tape tells him it is time to be loud again.

The Pomp Podcast · 2026-08-22 Permalink → Listen →
The Pomp Podcast Around 02:51 into the episode
Speaker 1

This episode is brought to you by Accenture. When your advertising operations fall out of sync, everything else follows. Spotify and Accenture are working together to reinvent the rhythm of ad sales using automation, analytics, and smarter workflows to simplify campaign delivery and access better data across the business. The result? Less time spent on operations, more time connecting brands with the moments and fandoms that matter most. Learn more at Accenture.com/slash Spotify.

Speaker 2

This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration blog, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

Jordi Visser

Bitcoin needs to be in people's portfolio because it is a hedge against abundance. It cannot be destroyed because it is built on beliefs, beliefs that it will have a store of value just like gold, except for one thing. It's digital. And so I think everyone needs to adjust their views. And my job has always been: I'm going to keep quiet on Bitcoin until the tape tells me that it's time to be loud again. It's time to be loud again.

Anthony Pompliano

What's going on, guys? Today we have a great conversation with Jordy Visser. And boy, is this one fun. We talk about Bitcoin and the 22% surge this week in the price. What's driving it? Is it sustainable? And how should you think about Bitcoin in your portfolio? We also talk about Stripe, Ramp, Anthropic, OpenAI, and many of the AI companies that are embracing various aspects of the industry. And then we talk about what's going on with public companies and why the multiples are compressing, how competition is now such a cutthroat part of this industry. And then we even talk about how investors are going to navigate all of the volatility, all of the change, and where exactly will Bitcoin end up over the coming months and years. I hope you enjoyed my latest conversation with Jordy Visser. All right, Jordy, Bitcoin is ripping higher. A week ago, you said that the prior two weeks were the two biggest weeks in Bitcoin's history, potentially. Here we are with Bitcoin now up 22% over the last seven days. Explain what has happened and why you think that this is a sustainable bull market now.

Jordi Visser

Well, when we talked two weeks ago, it was the week after situational awareness. It was the week after Kevin Warsh did nothing and basically said the bond market was doing the work for him. And then finished off that week with the most important thing. And I do believe the thing that most people either missed or for macro people in general, debating whether this will work or not. And that was the intervention into the yen. It was the beginning of what I would call intervention by Scott Besson to highlight in a contextual way with the economy racing, with stocks at all-time highs, and yet he felt the need to intervene for the first time since 1998 in the yen in a way that basically said, we don't want yields going higher. Then you have the quarterly refunding announcement shortly after, where they changed some language in there, leading into what happened this week, which is a change in the debt buyback. So rather than everyone sit there and argue about whether this is going to happen or not, I just want to remind people one thing. And I'm going to cover this extensively in the video this weekend. The tape doesn't lie. And the one thing that had been going on is despite everything that was happening, Bitcoin was acting better. It was handling bad news. We had the hacking into a wallet. We had Michael Saylor selling Bitcoin. We had all kinds of negative news, Clarity Act not getting through. And yet it was still trading well. It was hanging in there. The tape was telling you that something different was happening. But then when you get this week, and everyone should go read the ex posts that I've put out there, so far this is a seven sigma week in Bitcoin. There's only been three in the last decade that were greater than five. And so people understand what a sigma week is. This is taking the movement of Bitcoin for a weekly basis, in this case, over 20%, as of when we got on here, about 23%, and going through and dividing it by what a normal weekly move would be. And in this case, a seven, you know, we had a vol, a 60-day vol, which is what I'm using for my actual sigma calculation of 23. So it's a daily volatility. So when you go through it, you have basically a seven standard deviation move. The prior two that were above five, they happened in January, April of 19. And January of 23. And I hate to say that those were the beginnings or the end of the prior four-year cycles. Uh, since I've said on here, I don't subscribe to any four-year cycle. But in this case, we are getting the exact same Sigma move. And in those other two cases, believe it or not, we also broke above the 200-day moving average. So, all that leads into something I've said, which is I don't care about even trying to pick the bottom of this thing from a saying it's positive until we break above the 200-day moving average. In both of those prior times, we stayed above the 200-day moving average going forward. And Bitcoin started leading to a very large rally. I happen to think with all of the things that we've talked about, the AI agents, the fact that the government is showing that they want to run things hot. You have a secretary, a treasury secretary who is quoting Satoshi in exposts. You have Kevin Warsh, who's a Bitcoin lover. You have everybody in the administration that people should be paying attention, that something more important is going on here as the financial guardrails of the agentic world are starting to play out. And I'll leave with one more thing, which we can either talk about or not. But I'm spending a lot of time with what Stripe is doing. And my whole thesis is that the merging of AI and crypto and for Bitcoin, it will always be the purest AI trade at a time where we have AI not working as well as people want it to getting frustrated. And you have a move in Bitcoin, which is 23% in a very short amount of time.

Anthony Pompliano

Before we get to Stripe, Bitcoin itself feels like there's a couple of key components here. Earlier this week, I recorded a podcast and was asked, you know, what is my thoughts about Bitcoin and why it's been so stable. And I explicitly called out the fact that I didn't see a catalyst on the calendar. It wasn't obvious where the catalyst was going to come from. This seems like a very big kind of surprise announcement from the Treasury. Now, I think you understood kind of what was happening with the yen and the fact that they likely would have to do something, et cetera. But I think to the general market, they were not expecting the treasury to come in with, you know, kind of doubling of the capital going in here. And you see this, the stock market, Bitcoin, everything, you know, kind of rallying in response. And so I guess part of this is if you go and you look at these past moves, Rafael, who's one of the co-founders of GlassNode, he did the analysis and said in the past, there's been about 14 different five Sigma moves or larger. The forward return off of those moves over the next six months was 80% appreciation. So put aside for a second, 80% sounds like a great number. Who knows, you know, kind of how specific the numbers, but just a very large move happens after that. Do you put any weight on the vibe shift and the feeling that it kind of like awoken the Bitcoin community? And all of a sudden you see the persistent bid this week is going to be one of the biggest ETF inflow weeks since the all-time high Bitcoin price. Like it just feels like the world kind of got shaken awake and reminded Bitcoin is the answer to this government undisciplined monetary policy.

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode

Collections They Appear In