“One of my investors, who's very well regarded, told me that it's actually a good idea to make AIs hallucinate, because it's entertaining to watch AIs make mistakes and share that and screenshot it, and it goes viral on Twitter. And that'll give you a lot of new users. And obviously, we did the opposite of that.”

one of my investors who's very well regarded told me that, obviously, not going to name who. But one of his arguments was that it's actually a good idea to make AIs hallucinate because it's entertaining to watch AIs make mistakes and share that and screenshot it and it goes viral on Twitter. And that'll give you a lot of new users. And obviously, we did the opposite of that and we've been pretty good too. And I think fundamentally the problem we really solved is getting AIs to be accurate. And obviously that's immediately realizable in the form of an answer engine. But you can keep building on that accuracy foundations for deep research, browsing agents. Every form of eugenic action is search. You're searching for the right tool, you're searching for the right file, you're searching for the paragraph within the file, you're figuring out which files to use in a big repository of code. You're figuring out how to orchestrate different models, different connectors, how to put it all together to a final report or an answer or a web app or an artifact. Each of these individual actions is picking…