“…a lot of the work that was previously in the hands of a relatively small group of security researchers who had kind of well-understood norms around how disclosure works… Mythos has now put all that in the hands of my 12-year-old son, right? And who doesn't understand the norms and how disclosure is supposed to work.”

No, it's interesting. Everything old is new again. I'm old enough that I remember when back in the, again, you can go back to the late 90s and the early 2000s when everybody was talking about, well, is open source secure? I'm very concerned about that. If they can read my code, they could just see all my vulnerabilities, right? And I think everybody eventually got comfortable with the fact that the transparency makes you at least as secure as a proprietary system. And if you have a healthy community contributing and inspecting your code, then you're going to get, then you have a higher likelihood of being more secure, right? Everybody's comfortable with that. Mythos and all the other competing models. And by the way, this is not specific to any one model. The models are now good enough where they can discover vulnerabilities, they can start chaining vulnerabilities together. And it has changed the threat model, but I don't think that it is. I've not encountered people who have said, like, oh, well, obviously we need to go back to proprietary software now. I think everybody is, we all gain too much…