Connect your Claude, Codex or OpenClaw for full transcripts on millions of podcasts. Two week free trial, cancel anytime.
Start free trial →Core Memory · Startups & Venture · October 2026
Stephenson's theory of why films and TV default to dystopia: a ruined future is cheap to film, while a hopeful one takes real imaginative work. It came up in a discussion of efforts to get more optimistic science fiction made.
…or series of little side projects that doesn't, you know, I mean, it could have some kind of constructive effect. It could, you know, maybe help some writers or filmmakers, you know, get some traction somewhere. And, you know, like you say, a lot of people in the tech world are keen on the idea. So
clearly make the worst films, though.
Yeah. Well, so, I mean, this is a kind of hobby horse of mine for a long time, but I do think that my theory is that the big bang of this was the last shot of Planet of the Apes, where you see the Statue of Liberty, it's fallen over, you know, and it's a super powerful image, but a very inexpensive one, right? So, I mean, they got a model of the Statue of Liberty and they kicked it over and threw some dirt on it. And, you know, so that was a really cheap and easy way to make a very powerful image. And so you kind of see this in a lot of post-apocalyptic dystopian movies. You see examples where they've just taken something that exists today and sort of, you know, bang it around and throw some dirt on it. And, you know, it looks cool. And it doesn't require a big imaginative investment. Okay. Whereas if…
Okay. Okay. So they have to try harder,
be more creative.
Yeah, I think so.