“I'm not worried about AI designing a virus that kills us all. Not really. It's a theoretical risk, whatever. I'm not worried about a paperclip maximizer. I am worried about if one company or one nation or one company regulated by one nation is the only one that has frontier AI. That worries me far, far more.”

You know, even like Meta released a pretty good model and XAI's, you know, models pretty good. And Google just released some good stuff. Actually, my view is the natural state of AI is plural and highly competitive. And I say that because, so in tech, I worked in tech for a long time. The bulk of the huge market caps of companies come from network effects and natural monopolies, where you've got a system, a platform, or Ecosystem where the more customers and partners you bring into it, the more magnetic draw it has for other customers and partners. You make Facebook, and Facebook is valuable and crowds out other social networks because that's where everybody is, right? You make Windows, and every developer that builds an app for Windows makes it more attractive to more users, and more users on your operating system make it more attractive as an operating system for people to develop apps for. So, those sort of network effects of various sorts dominate tech and they create natural monopolies, right? We don't see any sign of strong network effects in AI. Okay. It's like you and I using ChatGPT…