“Federal lands make up 21% of the lower 48. They account for 3 or 4% respectively of each of our wind, solar, and geothermal. If you look at a map of federal lands across the country overlaid with utility-scale wind and solar development, you can see the wind and solar development filling in in the negative of all the federal land. It is deliberately avoiding it.”

Yes, I mean, if you want, we can go to the next one. No, no, go ahead. If you look at federal lands, which is not the only place that NEPA attaches, but the place that it certainly attaches disproportionately and kind of, you know, often requires the most fulsome and robust analysis. On federal lands in the U.S., federal lands make up 21% of the lower 48. They account for 3 or 4% respectively of each of our wind, solar, and geothermal. If you look at a map of federal lands across the country overlaid with utility-scale wind and solar development, you can see the wind and solar development filling in in the negative of all the federal land. It is deliberately avoiding it. There have been polls of developers, veteran developers who've developed 10 to 200 solar and transmission projects. And they ask them, you know, what is the most challenging kind of permitting, federal, local, or state? And they say federal by overwhelming majorities. They've asked them, have you ever avoided federal lands as a result of anticipating, you know, NEPA or other approvals? 82% yes…