Connect your Claude, Codex or OpenClaw for full transcripts on millions of podcasts. Two week free trial, cancel anytime.
The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch · Startups & Venture · October 2026
Asked about the data layer for agents, the LangChain founder argues that an agent's memory system will look more like an agent wrapped around a database than like a database alone. He says models are still poor at the reflection needed to decide what's worth remembering.
…happen, whether it's from the user interacting with like the, let's say, such traditional SaaS interacting with the software, or the user interacting with the agent and distilling that into information that's valuable enough to go into this context layer. That's the hard part in memory right now.
Why is that so hard?
Because it's tricky to get LLMs to do what you want them to do. And this type of like meta-reflection, I think, is something that LLMs actually still struggle at a lot, like reflecting on kind of like prompts and improving prompts, reflecting on agent architecture, improving agent architecture. We should build a benchmark for this. Internally, we do have some benchmarks for this in terms of Engine, which is our agent that's running on things. But I think this type of meta-reflection is still really difficult for agents. I think it's also generally like a hard thing for humans to do as well. Like, I don't know if we actually understand, some people probably do, so I shouldn't say this, but I don't know if we understand like what goes on inside our brain. Like, I feel like our brains are still kind of like complex things that we don't fully understand. And so, if we're trying to now replicate this kind of like learning process in a system, I think there's a bunch of different pieces. And so, I think models aren't great at kind of like reflection. And I don't think we know what this system should look like. What should the inputs be?…
Will the models be meaningfully better at reflection in 12 months?
Probably. I mean, it seems like they'll get better at everything. Do
you think the speed of model improvement will continue in the same manner of acceleration that it has done? Or do you think we are approaching some form of asymptotic plateauing?