“But when I hear that they want to slow down, there's a degree of suspicion, which is if you really think you're building something harmful, you don't have an obligation to ship it, right? If Boeing has a door flying off mid-air, it doesn't need Airbus to ground its planes in order to figure out how to fix its problem, right?”

…going to be wildly successful. They're still going to make money hand over fist. There's still going to be plenty of opportunity for great returns. I think what we're hearing, including from the shareholders, is just tell us where the lines on the road are. Tell us where the stop signs and the traffic lights are, and then make the consequences significant enough so that we can adhere to them. But when I hear that they want to slow down, there's a degree of suspicion, which is if you really think you're building something harmful, you don't have an obligation to ship it, right? If Boeing has a door flying off mid-air, it doesn't need Airbus to ground its planes in order to figure out how to fix its problem, right? And so I think we want my view is we want companies competing to develop safe and secure products, and we want to give them the incentive to do that. And I think that is good for shareholder returns. It's good for the public. And it's going to be necessary if we want products that are safe and secure. And I think we've learned our lesson on the first generation of the internet that just some…