Connect your Claude, Codex or OpenClaw for full transcripts on millions of podcasts. Two week free trial, cancel anytime.
Start free trial →Engineering Enablement · Software Engineering & Infra · November 2026
Brian Houck asked what surprised André Meyer most about what companies choose to measure, after he mapped more than 120 metrics from about 40 companies into the DevEx Metrics Compass. This is the biggest gap he found.
…the compass really helps you to navigate this fragmented landscape by exploring metrics, by comparing or benchmarking against other companies that are maybe similar to you, and also by allowing you to receive an actionable report at the end to sort of know where to get started and what to do next.
…many different metrics are sort of mapped together to different frameworks. And it's like, it's a lot of fun to go and dive into. And so as you were creating it, as you were diving into all of these metrics in use across the industry, what surprised you most about what companies choose to measure?
Before I answer one quick addition to my previous response, I wanted to give a shout out to also my collaborators on the compass briefly, Thomas Fritz, Gail Murphy and Patrick Meyer, who helped me with all of that and setting it up and giving feedback and so on. And to come back to your question about what surprised me the most is that most of those metrics are focusing around development related activities and almost none of the metrics around collaboration. And the challenge around that is that developers spend maybe 30, 40, 50% of their time in collaboration and communication. But with those dashboards, we don't really understand how this part is impacting their work lives and their developer experience.
I think collaboration is part of the very definition of developer productivity. It is one of the dimensions of space and has been often the hardest to understand because collaboration is incredibly important to delivering innovation, but it can also be an incredibly large source of toil. And I'm…
Not that I've seen, to be honest. And there are only very few collaboration metrics that we actually have. That's the opportunity, I guess. Exactly. That's an opportunity for researchers, for DX and many others to contribute. I think that some good measures would evolve around finding a balance…
Which is like a huge shout out to the idea of measuring sort of meeting like clustering. And do you have sufficiently large gaps between meetings to do deep focused work? Found that that can be substantially more predictive of how much work devs get done than just like the total number of meetings.…