Corinne Low

Things Corinne Says on Podcasts

Economist at Wharton. Author, Having It All: What Data Tells Us About Women's Lives and Getting the Most Out of Yours.

Where to Find Them

Corinne Low writes Femonomics , writes The Takeaway with Liz Moody , writes Provoked with Dr. Todd Kashdan and writes More to Hate . They have also been a guest on This Week in Business (2 times) , So Money with Farnoosh Torabi (2 times) , More or Less , Do Good To Lead Well with Craig Dowden , The Stacking Benjamins Show , Corporate F*ckery , Behavioral Grooves Podcast and Psychology at Work | Career Success, Leadership, Communication Skills .

Recently: “Wharton’s Corinne Low on How to Get More Life Out of Your Money, Time, and Career SB1913” on The Stacking Benjamins Show (October 2026); “What I Wish I Knew 10 Years Ago: Corinne Low” on The Takeaway with Liz Moody (October 2026); “Three Things I Learned about Women’s Time” on Femonomics (October 2026); “Announcing the Workforce Futures Lab” on Femonomics (October 2026); “Everyone said learn to code, no one said learn to care” on Femonomics (September 2026); “Letting go of mistakes” on Femonomics (August 2026).

What They Said

“What you need if you're going to do this is really good insurance that you are going to be okay if this marriage doesn't last. And so the paper shows that buying a home serves as that insurance because the home is going to be divided in the case of divorce. And so we see that couples who own homes are more likely to specialize.” — Corinne Low, The Stacking Benjamins Show

Low explains her paper "Collateralized Marriage." After the divorce revolution of the 1970s, women stopped specializing in home and children because it left them exposed. A shared house acts as divorce insurance, and homeowning couples are more likely to have one partner step back from work.

The Stacking Benjamins Show · 2026-10-21 Permalink → Listen →
The Stacking Benjamins Show Around 29:31 into the episode
Speaker 3

Yes, if you do that, then you know, that's really being a provider today, okay? I don't want

Joe Saul-Sehy

…you heard about them, you got to let them know it's because you're a stacker. You heard them on the Stacking Benjamin show. It's the best way to support the show. Let's go back to the line that opened the show. Unpack this. Why is buying a house together basically buying insurance against divorce?

Speaker 3

…to work part-time sometime during her career. Maybe they both start out at law firms working 60, 70 hours a week. And then they decide it's better for him to work 80 and make partner and for her to switch into a supporting role at the law firm to switch into recruiting or, you know, something that's not client-facing. See this in a lot of couples. His income grows and hers doesn't grow as much. What you need if you're going to do this is really good insurance that you are going to be okay if this marriage doesn't last. And so the paper shows that buying a home serves as that insurance because the home is going to be divided in the case of divorce. And so we see that couples who own homes are more likely to specialize. And again, not that extreme specialization of the past, but are more likely to have a little bit of that safety where she can invest more at home and in the kids and he can invest more in the career. And we see it pay off in his career. He actually earns more and we see it pay off in the outcomes that we see for the family.

Joe Saul-Sehy

They talk about in good movie making that a good movie has high stakes. They're not just fighting like some of these superhero movies drive me crazy because they're fighting and I'm like, okay, when this 50 minutes gets over, you know, so I generally don't like those. But when the characters have…

Speaker 3

Yeah. And we're both showing, right, that we have skin in the game. And therefore, it also nudges you to say, when times get hard, let's figure out how to renegotiate our terms rather than turning to that batna, right? Because now, you know, you kind of have more invested in that joint capital. And…

Joe Saul-Sehy

Well, and I look at it the other way as let's get away from that traditional role. Let's flip it. Let's say that her career has more upside potential. She's really loving what she does. He's not loving what he does. And maybe we flip the traditional roles. You've done studies that show that she is…

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode
“And your job does not love you back. If your job goes through downsizing or has a financial crunch, they will lay you off. Love will not keep you there. Okay. You are not actually a family. So I think it's important to be a little bit less romantic about these relationships with our jobs and a little bit more transactional.” — Corinne Low, The Stacking Benjamins Show

The Wharton economist points out that people who say they love their jobs never picture working 60 hours a week if money were no object. She suggests thinking of a job as a technology for converting time into money, and checking whether you get out what you put in.

The Stacking Benjamins Show · 2026-10-21 Permalink → Listen →
The Stacking Benjamins Show Around 26:07 into the episode
Speaker 3

…and maintaining them is actually very dependent on those systemic factors. When somebody helps you live your best life, have your all, get your utility needs met, you're going to sustain love and attraction a lot more versus when you feel like someone else's goals are in conflict with yours.

Joe Saul-Sehy

Wow. And actually, you can even apply that to the job, right? You could apply it to your boss. You could apply it to your relationship at work.

Speaker 3

…what would you do if you were mega billionaire, nobody says they'd be working 60 hours a week. People like you who say, I love talking to people, I love educating people, and you get a lot of meaning from your job. And for me, too, in doing research and educating people about that research, I get a lot of meaning for my job. If money were no object, do it for like 15 hours a week, maybe 20. And your job does not love you back. If your job goes through downsizing or has a financial crunch, they will lay you off. Love will not keep you there. Okay. You are not actually a family. So I think it's important to be a little bit less romantic about these relationships with our jobs and a little bit more transactional. And as I said, think about our job as a technology for converting our time into money. And the better the technology is, you might get meaning along with it, right? You might get fulfillment along with the money. And that's great. Isn't it great if you can convert your time into money and get meaning and fulfillment at the same time? But I think a big mistake is people were, they're getting all…

Joe Saul-Sehy

I want to take a little detour from this wonderful kind of straightforward walk we're having. When you're talking about love, you also talk about the dating apps. And I find some of this stuff that you brought up so gross. Like just, but the statistics don't lie, right? Stats don't lie. The um…

Speaker 3

Well, that's. Exactly, what I mean is that when people say, like, oh, no, it's all about love, and then I can say, like, well, I've run the studies and I can tell you it's not all about love, right? Because if I change people's characteristics, people get a different reaction on dating apps. And…

Joe Saul-Sehy

Been a long time since I've killed a wild boar for Cheryl, Corinne. But I have changed the toilet paper off.

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode

Collections They Appear In