Nathan Lambert

Things Nathan Says on Podcasts

ML researcher making sense of AI research, products, and the uncertain technological future. PhD from Berkeley AI. Experience at Meta, DeepMind, HuggingFace.

Where to Find Them

Nathan Lambert hosts and writes Interconnects , hosts and writes Interconnects (Nathan Lambert) , writes Nathan Lambert , writes natolambert overflow , hosts ChinaTalk , writes Latent Space , writes ThursdAI - The top AI news from the past week , writes Understanding AI , writes Interconnected and writes AI for Software Engineers . They have also been a guest on Lex Fridman Podcast (2 times) , AI Proem , a16z Podcast , Scaling Laws , TBPN , The Cognitive Revolution" | AI Builders, Researchers, and Live Player Analysis , The MAD Podcast with Matt Turck and Super Data Science: ML & AI Podcast with Jon Krohn . They also write for Retort AI and Trillium Labs on Substack.

Recently: “Latest open artifacts (#25): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, American-made models, and new regulatory controls in the US & China” on Interconnects (Nathan Lambert) (October 2026); “Meta shakes up the frontiers, open and closed” on Interconnects (Nathan Lambert) (October 2026); “Meta shakes up the frontiers, open and closed” on Interconnects (October 2026); “Meta shakes up the frontiers, open and closed” on Interconnects (October 2026); “Can Open Models Keep Up With the AI Frontier? | Nathan Lambert” on a16z Podcast (October 2026); “I expect rapid progress but not towards general superintelligence” on Interconnects (October 2026).

What They Said

“What they don't have is compute. You talk to people there and you're like, oh, I heard an average OpenAI researcher has 5,000 H100 equivalents that they can access at any time. And like their jaw just falls to the floor. They're just like, I can't comprehend. And this is like a top pre-training researcher at one of the labs that you would know.” — Nathan Lambert, a16z Podcast

Lambert, who has met researchers at the Chinese open-model labs, says they are technically excellent and roughly equal in talent to US labs, but far more compute-starved. He is skeptical that distillation from US models explains much of their progress.

a16z Podcast · 2026-10-14 Permalink → Listen →
a16z Podcast Around 08:22 into the episode
Nathan Lambert

…was released, we talked about consolidation in the industry and predicting it. And I think we're just starting to see a much more active mergers and acquisitions market. But I thought this was going to happen two years ago. And the open model companies have lasted much longer than I thought.

Lisha Li

…the Chinese labs, since you've actually met with them and you've studied this a lot more, is it sort of like they're all-rounded, like great at pre-training, also have their own good post-training recipes that they may or may not have revealed. And where do you see the levers kind of accelerating?

Nathan Lambert

Yeah, so the Chinese labs are very technically excellent. They are more compute-starved. I think without a doubt, they have a comparable talent pool to draw on. I think there might be like a slight edge based on who was where when AI really got going. But to say that China is anything but equal in talent, you're going to have a hard time because they just have so many people being trained at such a high level. And what they don't have is compute. You talk to people there and you're like, oh, I heard an average open AI researcher has 5,000 H100 equivalents that they can access at any time. And like their jaw just falls to the floor. They're just like, I can't comprehend. And this is like a top pre-training researcher at one of the labs that you would know. And then you have this interaction a few times. And the compute thing, I think, is the biggest difference. And Distillation is a way to effectively spend more money to get what is compute equivalent. Like outputs from a language model are a function of compute. And if you know the outputs you want, it's the same as having compute to generate with a model. And I've seen the…

Lisha Li

how is that? There

Nathan Lambert

are so many companies. There's like 20 to 30 companies that are building good models. You can like read. Yeah, yeah. And it's like, you just, and like, it's hard for me to get over. And I think that there's this very prominent paper that says like stealing reasoning traces from closed models. And I…

Lisha Li

Right. So that's

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode

Collections They Appear In