“No one talks to Google in complete sentences. No one says, hey, Google, I have a question about the capital of Australia. Could you please let me know what that is? No, they just type in Australia Capital Enter, right? Because we don't anthropomorphize that particular AI-based system. … The era of anthropomorphized chatbots was an accident.”

…Anthropics actual business plan. We don't really know how exactly they plan to deal with this. My personal opinion on this is that anthropomorphized chatbots is a bad idea. There's no reason why we need to talk and receive text in fluent English from a chatbot for them to be useful. The example I often give is Google. Google is an example of a tool where we interact with it to get information. No one talks to Google in complete sentences. No one says, hey, Google, I have a question about the capital of Australia. Could you please let me know what that is? No, they just type in Australia Capital Enter, right? Because we don't anthropomorphize that particular AI-based system. We just know it's a source of information. That might be where we need to go. And it's where I think we probably should go. The era of anthropomorphized chatbots was an accident. ChatGPT was never meant to be a major product of OpenAI. That caught them off guard when it began to take off in late 2022. So if criminal liability is upheld at even the state level, which is what Florida is trying to…