“If every project that we're doing has greater than 50% chance of success, we're not being ambitious enough. There's got to be something in our portfolio that we think only has a 10% chance of success. And that's where we see the real breakthroughs and the real changes in innovation.”

…build stuff and I want predictable outcomes, I think it can be difficult to maybe loosen the reins a little bit. And I'm not saying that people should go out and immediately turn over their entire organization to an LLM. But are we creating enough space within our organizations to have experimentation that is pushing the boundaries of what an LLM can do? You know, a lot of times I'll talk about if every project that we're doing has greater than 50% chance of success, we're not being ambitious enough. There's got to be something in our portfolio that we think only has a 10% chance of success. And that's where we see the real breakthroughs and the real changes in innovation. And so are we giving the LLMs big enough tasks? Are we turning enough over, again, not across the board, not recklessly, not all at once, but are we creating those areas of real frontier experimentation to push the limits and see what's possible?