Connect your Claude, Codex or OpenClaw for full transcripts on millions of podcasts. Two week free trial, cancel anytime.
Start free trial →a16z Podcast · Startups & Venture · September 2026
Sinofsky ran Microsoft's Windows division for years and is now a board partner at a16z. He was asked about the Stop Rogue AI Act and the wave of AI bills that followed the OpenAI agent incident, and his argument is that the vocabulary of AI safety — alignment, goal-seeking, rogue agents — is doing the damage, because it turns ordinary engineering failures into something mystical that only outside authorities can fix. His prescription is the unglamorous one: better telemetry, debugging and incident reporting.
The AI people are making it impossible for anybody to understand what they've done. And they're using words like, well, the AI failed to be aligned. Okay, what does that mean? What it means is there was a bug in the software. When Word ate your file and deleted all your content, we didn't think that demons had taken over Word and made it do things against the will of man. But software doesn't do what it's supposed to do. It's a bug.
When AI does something we didn't expect, is it misaligned or does the software just have a bug? A16Z board partner and former Microsoft Windows president Steven Sinofsky joins Theo Jaffee and Sofia Puccini on MTS to argue that the language around AI safety is making the technology harder to…
We are live with Steven Sinofsky, who is a board partner at Andreessen Horowitz. He's a seed investor, author of the Substack and the book Hardcore Software. Previously, he was the president of Microsoft's Windows division, engineering and marketing across Windows, Windows Live, and Internet…
Oh, wow.