Connect your Claude, Codex or OpenClaw for full transcripts on millions of podcasts. Two week free trial, cancel anytime.
Start free trial →WSJ's Take On the Week · November 2026
Telis had summed up that the recent AI sell-off was more about financing costs and interest rates than a turning point for AI itself. Asa's takeaway: who can raise money, and at what price, is now the key question.
…the longer-term bond market is telling you is like, okay, maybe actually the Fed doesn't have to do that much more tightening before we do see things start to slow down. And so we don't need to buy 10-year bonds at like these huge yields because the Fed's going to stop maybe at an earlier point.
I like that idea.
Well, I think that one of the takeaways here is that capital is king, right? I mean, the capital window is wide open. People can raise money. I mean, Anthropic can, at least, they hope. They're hoping to raise up to $100 billion in this IPO. So what matters now for these companies like Core Weeve, like Anthropic, like others, is capital. And if you look at other players like Meta platforms, wants to, you know, they're raising $35 billion in equity at the moment, and they plan to raise another $60 billion through at the market transactions, meaning basically they just issue stock at different times strategically. You know, this is a lot of money.
It's a lot of
money to ask investors to give them, essentially, to pay for AI. So there's this wave of people begging for money, if you will, and investors, whether you're a credit investor or on the equity side, having to weigh whether to give them that money or name your price for giving you that money. So I…
I would say if they can raise equity, like if Meta can really raise all that equity, if Anthropic can go public successfully, like if the equity markets are there for everyone, that's a pretty good sign for the bond market because that's just more cushion for bondholders who are in a capital stack…