The Real Eisman Playbook · September 2026
Eisman, who is best known for shorting subprime mortgages, says he cannot understand why almost nobody outside a few Substack writers has picked this up from NVIDIA's own filing. It sits inside a longer argument he and George Noble make that the AI trade rests on a short chain of dependencies — and that far down that chain are two companies, OpenAI and Anthropic, that lose enormous sums. Note that he slides from receivables to revenue mid-sentence; the 70% figure in the filing is accounts receivable.
I mean, the circular financing kind of drives me crazy. But I'll turn it around. If by some miracle, Anthropic and OpenAI became insanely profitable, it wouldn't matter because the loans would be good. The circular financing just tells me that there's probably something wrong. But in and of itself, it's not necessarily the issue.
Correct. But what you wouldn't do, you wouldn't blindly say, oh, look at the earnings, look at the PE. Not at all. I'm going to give you an example on something that NVIDIA
when they reported that I still to this day can't understand why no one has commented on this other than a few sub stackers, which is NVIDIA's revenue in the quarter that was just recently reported was up over 100%. But if you go in the queue, it says that 70% of accounts receivable is from five accounts. I mean, think about it this way, that the largest company on planet Earth, basically 70% of its revenue comes from five. Customers is very frightening.
Yes.
That's frightening.
But as you pointed out, the receivables piling up, the loans, the whole deal, if it was a healthy system, if the banks thought this was a good business or private credits now and it's back on its heels. If there were healthy lenders that thought these are good credits, they'd make loans. They'd make loans. But they're not doing it. Why?