Connect your Claude, Codex or OpenClaw for full transcripts on millions of podcasts. Two week free trial, cancel anytime.
Sharp Tech with Ben Thompson · Tech Strategy & Big Tech · October 2026
Thompson is explaining why he thinks AI safety debates end up in "crazy places." He argues for treating models as tools to make more understandable and controllable, and says Anthropic goes the opposite way on each of those points.
news. And it's so funny. Like so many safety people were so dismissive of this, of this paper immediately because it gives a real blow to their view. Sure.
It undermines the narrative. And it turns out this paper is
…than my fist. This idea of there's something that exceeds some of our characteristics is not a strange concept. Right. It's just like we're, and part of this is, I think, Silicon Valley, the sort of person in Silicon Valley, is so, their sense of self-worth and value is so wrapped up in being smart. Everyone in Silicon Valley has always been the smart one. And like, that's how they, there's, and so this idea that something's smarter than me is so overwhelming. It's such a blow to the psyche that you have one side is like descending into nihilism. It's all over. And the other side is like, it's okay if it's God. God can be smarter than me. Alignment, You end up in like these crazy places. And I just, I just think it's wrong. I think we need to be pushing towards making these tools, making them controllable. And part of that is helping people think about them in this way. Okay. Anthropic on every single those points goes in the opposite direction.
Well, a counter to this conversation and that. Well, the part of this conversation
is that Opus 5.5 is unbelievable. It's not just time for everything. And there's an aspect of Quad is so much better at agentic stuff in my experience. Yeah. Because it just, it can multitask better. It can keep track of lots of different things, all the stuff that's going on. Like ChatGPT gets so…
I think that people should think about Anthropic Alignment, whether they are aligned with humanity's best interests in terms of how they view these tools and how they're framing these tools for the masses to understand. I will note, though, that their Claude branding seems a lot more coherent than…