“Just because the model is free doesn't mean that everything around it is free. If you are an enterprise and you want to run open models, you need to get the compute from somewhere, and the software for managing that compute and serving the models. Just the technology for serving the models is complex and hard to do. You can think about the open model as the engine, but the engine is useless without a car.”

No, I think you're right. But it's kind of like what would be the analogy here? The model may be free, even though some models choose to license. So you can have an open model that someone can own that has a license attached to it, right? And that's, you know, Meta's latest model, Muse, has a license attached to it, a commercial license if you're a distributor. Kimi K3 has a license attached to it if you're a distributor. So you can have open where there's a license attached to it that can be monetized. And by the way, even Linux, it has a license attached to it where if you make certain modifications to it, those have to be open as well. So it's not like there's a whole ecosystem of licenses around open source software and open models. And so it doesn't necessarily mean that open means free. Now, most licenses on open models today are free. And even our model, Beam that we released, it's an Apache 2 license, meaning that it is free. But just because the model is free doesn't mean that everything around it is free. If you are a customer or an enterprise and you want to run open models, well, you need to get the compute from somewhere. So you need to pay for the compute. You need to get…