“I think AI can help form a better plan, but it wouldn't actually help you execute that plan. ... My normal response there is to point to incentive problems. ... I'm on the von Mises Hayek side of the calculation debate. And I also believe in the inherent good of the market as a coordinating mechanism.”

…think it still doesn't make sense. Like, I think AI can help form a better plan, but it wouldn't actually help you execute that plan. Then if something changes, you would then have to reform the plan. It kind of would be the worst of both worlds in many ways. But my normal response there is to point to incentive problems. And that normally wins the argument, though I am actually a pure believer. I'm on the von Mises Hayek side of the calculation debate. And I also believe in the inherent good of the market as a coordinating mechanism. But I would say this is probably the largest grouping of a very fragmented set of set of beliefs. But serious interrogation with the history of socialist economies and also just thinking and laying out, we spend a lot of the book laying out the normative case for a very radical form of egalitarianism, but kind of starting with the, here's what we believe actually helps lay the groundwork for…