← Things People Say on Podcasts

“I no longer think that ecological limits, resource limits, energy limits are going to force us to change.” Charles Eisenstein · The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens

September 2026

“I no longer think that ecological limits, resource limits, energy limits are going to force us to change.” — Charles Eisenstein, The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens

This is the line the episode opens on, and Eisenstein frames it as the biggest change in his beliefs over the last ten years. He is giving up the idea that running into physical limits will do the persuading for us; we can keep going, he says, at greater and greater cost. What replaces the forcing function is a question nobody can be compelled to answer: what do we actually want to sustain?

The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens · 2026-09-02 Listen to the episode → More from Charles Eisenstein →

Transcript

The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens Around 00:00 into the episode
Charles Eisenstein

This is the biggest change in my beliefs that has happened over the last 10 years. I no longer think that ecological limits, resource limits, energy limits are going to force us to change. If we want to continue the story of separation, we will do so at a greater and greater and greater cost to the rest of life and to our own souls. The increasingly difficult conditions to sustain that are a louder and louder invitation for us to ask: what do we want to sustain? How do we want to live? How do we want to be? Got to bring it all in. Once we do that, then let's start asking, What is mine to do?

Nate Hagens

You're listening to The Great Simplification. I'm Nate Hagins. On this show, we describe how energy, the economy, the environment, and human behavior all fit together and what it might mean for our future. By sharing insights from global thinkers, we hope to inform and inspire more humans to play emergent roles in the coming Great Simplification. Today, I'm joined by frequently requested guest, Charles Eisenstein, to discuss how the story of separation permeates through our culture and our institutions, shaping how we relate to each other and the natural world. Most importantly, Charles and I explore how the mindset of separation causes us to get in our own way as we navigate the unfolding more-than-human predicament. Charles Eisenstein is an American author, public speaker, and teacher whose work focuses on civilization, consciousness, money, and human cultural evolution. He graduated from Yale University in 1989 with a degree in mathematics and philosophy and spent the following decade at a Chinese-English translator before turning to writing and speaking full-time, including as the former speechwriter for RFK Jr. Charles is the author of many books, including The Ascent of Humanity, Sacred Economics, and The More Beautiful World Our Hearts Know is Possible. In this conversation, Charles and I wind through economics, money, climate, and language, tracing how the stories we tell ourselves ultimately shape the physical world that we live in and how we experience that world. We talk about why separation sits at the root of so many of our largest crises today and why trying to solve those crises by using the same narratives that created them gets us nowhere. Instead, Charles argues that by reframing our stories towards one of interbeing, we can start planting the seeds of a different system, even as the old one falls apart around us. With that, please welcome Charles Eisenstein. Charles Eisenstein, great to see you.

Charles Eisenstein

Good to be here, Nate. Happy to be talking to you.

Nate Hagens

So, you are probably one of the top five most requested guests over the years. So, I'm glad we're finally able to schedule this and have a conversation. You have spent over two decades writing and speaking about foundational stories and mythologies that underpin human civilization. You especially focus on the concept or the idea of separation. So, before we go down into any specific rabbit holes, maybe you can share why you've centered your work so heavily around the stories that we tell ourselves and maybe give a concrete example about how our current cultural mythology actually shapes everyday lived experience.

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode