EC

Erika Cheung

Things Erika Says on Podcasts

Where to Find Them

Erika Cheung has been a guest on Project Medtech and Start Here .

Recently: “Bonus: Theranos Whistleblower Erika Cheung Reacts to 'You Can See Everything'” on Start Here (November 2026); “Episode 116 | Erika Cheung, Co-Founder at Ethics in Entrepreneurship | A Theranos Whistleblower: The Importance of Ethics in a Startup Company” on Project Medtech (November 2022).

What They Said

“That to me is what integrity is. It's not me being morally upright and saying I'm here to save the day. It's like, no, we said we were going to do this thing and we're not doing this thing. And worse yet, we're doing the exact opposite. We could kill people. I don't understand how you don't do anything.” — Erika Cheung, Start Here

Asked why, at 22 and in her first job, she chose to report what she saw at Theranos, she says framing it as heroism misses the point.

Start Here · 2026-11-07 Permalink → Listen →
Start Here Around 14:26 into the episode
Speaker 4

…a great space to be in personally. That even though it was very hard for me, I've been able to make my peace with it and be able to build a better life for myself and other people. And I think that's the best outcome that anyone could hope from what was a horrible situation for many, many years.

Speaker 1

…You paint the picture. This was your first job. You're 22 years old. It's not like you have a big group of people who you can go to and ask, what should I do? Am I making the right choice right now? You didn't have some kind of safety net, but you still made the decision to tell the truth. Why?

Speaker 4

It's because of the patience, right? It was the simple fact. Like, honestly, this blowing up into a big case and all this, I could have never had any insight into that. For me, it was really we're testing on patients with a faulty product. This product needs to get pulled because it could kill people or could just devastate their lives. And those patients could be my sister. Those patients could be my mom. Those patients could be me. And as much as I try and rationalize for people, it's very intuitive, right? I was very genuine in I joined Theranos because I wanted to be able to make sure that people received good and affordable health care. And when what we were doing was so incongruous with that mission, it's just, I just can't help myself, right? I can't help myself but say something. Even though this whole experience was so hard, it was so easy because it was so clear that this just needed to stop. And, you know, I was so grateful, in fact, for every door that I uncovered to just get people to garner more awareness on we need to stop like that company needs to stop testing patients.…

Speaker 2

Today, I want to tell you about our friends at Lug. If you're traveling this season, whether you're seeing family or catching some sun in a tropical destination, Lug can help you and your essentials get everywhere you need to go. Lug makes sturdy, premium quality, hard-sided wheelie bags for all…

Speaker 4

Savings.com/slash start here.

Speaker 3

This message is brought to you by Avocado Mattress.

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.
“Of course there will be people who want to work for her again. Especially in the Valley there's this ethos: you failed, and then you can come back and have this comeback story of building a company that proves everyone wrong and you were the underdog. Everyone wants to buy into that new narrative. I have no doubts that she will find some subset of people that will invest in her. But what I know about point of care diagnostics, it's highly unlikely that business will take off.” — Erika Cheung, Start Here

Asked whether people in Silicon Valley would work for Elizabeth Holmes again on a new venture in the same space, she explains the Valley's appetite for comeback stories while doubting the business itself.

Start Here · 2026-11-07 Permalink → Listen →
Start Here Around 21:39 into the episode
Speaker 4

…right solution for everyone, but it was mine. I had to come to forgiveness with everything that happened. And I genuinely like, you know, I wish this person well. Like spend that time with your kids, you know, heal those horrible things that happened to you. Like, just be well. Focus on being well.

Speaker 1

…on a new business in the same space. And I hear what your feelings are sort of towards that idea. But what I'm most curious about is knowing the world that you operated in, Silicon Valley, are there people out there right now who will want to work for Elizabeth Holmes again on a similar venture?

Speaker 4

Of course there will be. Of course there will be, right? Not only do people have to feed their families and are interested in the prospect of like, hey, I need to make an income, but people, especially in the Valley, kind of have this ethos sometimes, right? Like, oh, well, you failed. And then you like can come back and like have this comeback story of building this company that then like proves everyone wrong and you were the underdog. And, you know, this is where you get to show everyone that they were wrong about you. So I think everyone wants to buy in this new narrative of that possibility. So I have, I have no doubts that she will find some subset of people that will buy into her or that will invest in her. It just seems like we've seen this play out in other scenarios too. I think it's the question: is this going to be a successful business? What I know about point of care diagnostics and at least my experience with this person's competency, it's highly unlikely, highly unlikely that that business will take off, in my opinion. And maybe this is more fodder for her too, or Carter. I don't know. But those aren't the ingredients for success in my mind.

Speaker 1

From conversations with you and some of the other people who we got to know along the way with Theranos, there's a degree of chatter happening because of this, because of this film. Have you exchanged messages with any of your former Theranos colleagues? And what are people saying?

Speaker 4

So I'm actually supposed to meet with Tyler. That's funny. I just thought you made me realize actually that I didn't tell him hello. Yeah, I didn't respond back to him. I was supposed to actually talk to him today. You know, there's some chatter. You know, the unfortunate thing, I think people…

Speaker 3

The next chapter is here. The Hulu Original Series: The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives. Orange County is coming to Hulu and Hulu on Disney Plus on November 12th.

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.
“The thing that I hope people realize if they're working for a company is it's one thing to pay attention to what people are saying. It's another to pay attention to what they're doing. Holmes has always been remarkably good at saying things that make you believe her, that make you empathize with her, that make you be inspired by her. But when you really get into the details of the way she behaves and the way she treats people, it paints a whole different narrative.” — Erika Cheung, Start Here

Reacting to a new documentary about Theranos, she gives the lesson she hopes employees take from it about charismatic founders.

Start Here · 2026-11-07 Permalink → Listen →
Start Here Around 12:23 into the episode
Speaker 1

…argue, risked your career. You risked your ability to make money and you didn't have a safety net there. And in return for taking that risk, you faced, like you said, cars showing up at your new place of work. There was cruelty at the heart of what you faced after you told the truth about Theranos.

Speaker 2

Yeah. I think people don't realize the amount of retaliatory behavior that Holmes exhibited. Right. And it's very hard if you weren't there and you didn't see it firsthand of how many people were fired. How many people were

Speaker 4

screamed at? How many people were threatened to lose their jobs? And that was the same case for me, right? Like for me, coming forward and sharing my concerns about what was happening with the patient testing, you know, I thought this was me doing my job. And to come back and realize, oh, this company spent $150,000 to hire intelligence agencies and private investigators to follow me when I was 22 years old because they didn't want to confront that reality and that bad news. Like that's just so extreme. Like there are these things that I think people are unable to see in this film. And my hope, you know, there's this unsettlingness. I think when I was watching the film, just like you were saying, like there's so much to process. And I think it was a remarkable job that Lance and Nathan did in making us all realize how vulnerable we are to being deceived by what people say. And I think coming out of it, like we're describing, all the former employees, everyone else, the thing that I hope people realize if they're in this position and they're working for a company is it's one thing to pay attention to what people are saying. It's another to be pay attention to what they're doing. And that takes time and that takes just experience with them. And I…

Speaker 1

I completely agree. Did you see the movie with anyone else or did you go alone?

Speaker 4

I saw it with my brother and I saw it with my partner. So yeah, it was good. It was good to, I think being a boyfriend of someone involved in this case is always challenging because you're like, you know, you want, you want to be protective of me because, you know, I'm in the position, like…

Speaker 1

We are definitely going to dig into the work that you are doing now to try to help people who might find themselves in similar situations in the future. But I want to talk to you a little bit about this thing that I always admired about you. You paint the picture. This was your first job. You're 22…

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.
“One of the most effective ways to find out whether these firms are engaging in things that can harm the public and everyday Americans is through whistleblowing and internal reporting. We really want to get it to a place that a whistleblower doesn't have to choose between their career and doing the right thing. AI is going to be super pervasive in everything we do. We need to make sure if someone sees something wrong, that they'll be protected.” — Erika Cheung, Start Here

Asked about her current advocacy, she describes pushing Congress to pass an AI whistleblower protection bill. She argues the risks of AI companies are best surfaced by insiders.

Start Here · 2026-11-07 Permalink → Listen →
Start Here Around 29:23 into the episode
Speaker 4

…ages, but we'll go on like family vacation every year together. And it's been really critical for me to like find people who have gone through that experience. And there's like a solidarity and community there that I never ever in my life expected I'd be a part of, but I'm very grateful I am.

Speaker 1

And you are currently working on building awareness of the AI Whistleblower Protection Act. Tell me a little bit more about that and what you're hoping to accomplish.

Speaker 4

Yeah, I think, you know, AI is kind of too big of a word, but there are certain risks that are going to come with implementing AI models into all these different industries. And I think just like myself, one of the most effective ways to find out. Whether these firms are engaging in things that can harm the public and everyday Americans is through whistleblowing and internal reporting. And we really want to get it to a place that a whistleblower doesn't have to choose between their career and doing the right thing. And so Senator Grassley has been a big supporter of whistleblower bills for decades. And we're trying to really push the AI Whistleblower Protection Act with Congress right now and have been doing a lot of advocacy for that because AI is going to be super pervasive in everything we do. We need to make sure if someone sees something wrong, that they'll be protected. And this lowers the barrier for them to speak up if they see something that harms the public. So I'd be appreciative. Again, that goal of asking people for help, this would be really helpful.

Speaker 1

Are there any scenes that stand out to you from the film the most?

Speaker 4

Oh, I think her looking at the device and like explaining it, where she's basically just says, like, and then you put it in the cloud and then the cloud, and it's like, oh, so you just don't have local servers. You have a server over there. It was, I think, I think that was very shocking. And then…

Speaker 1

wasn't the device, right? Like the device that they looked at in the film is not the device you were working with.

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.
“I think you can tell a story of what's possible, but there's still a line to be drawn. Hey, I have revenue generating contracts that I don't actually have. Hey, I have a product that doesn't work, but I'm still going to test on patients. Entrepreneurs need to understand where they draw those boundaries. A vision is a beautiful thing. But with Theranos, it's very different than, hey, I'm going to treat you like a lab rat and test on you with this thing that doesn't work, and abuse that trust and give you wrong results.” — Erika Cheung, Start Here

The interviewer raised the startup argument that founders have to bend the rules and tell the best story to change healthcare. The Theranos whistleblower separates ambitious vision from fabricated contracts and a product that doesn't work.

Start Here · 2026-11-07 Permalink → Listen →
Start Here Around 38:40 into the episode
Speaker 4

…but let's. Keep pushing forward where there's still the opportunity to do a lot of good. And where you have these one or two outliers of people who are in it for themselves, that there's a whole community of people who are really mobilizing to help other people. So I suppose that's my hope.

Speaker 1

…your product or your business if you're not showing them some kind of results. But you're also not going to keep going. You won't get to keep iterating and learning and growing and doing something better if that money isn't flowing in. So you have to bend the rules. You have to tell the best story.

Speaker 4

I think you can tell a story of what's possible, but there's still a line to be drawn into saying, hey, I have revenue generating contracts that I don't actually have, right? Hey, I have a product that doesn't work, but I'm still going to test on patients, right? And I think entrepreneurs specifically need to understand like where do they draw those boundaries. A vision is a beautiful thing. The possibilities of where we can go in the world, those are beautiful things. But I think when we deal with the Theranos case, it's very different than, hey, I'm going to treat you like a lab rat and test on you with this thing that doesn't work. And even though you're instilling your trust in me, I'm going to abuse that trust and give you wrong results. So I can see that argument and I understand where people are going, but I think you have to put that argument in an appropriate context and not necessarily leverage that in a way to license bad behavior.

Speaker 1

Erika Cheung, thank you so much for joining us today.

Speaker 4

Thank you, Rebecca.

Speaker 1

A representative for Elizabeth Homes tells us the company her partner, Billy Evans, discussed in the film called Hey Manthus is quote, a totally him project. She has had zero involvement and that Elizabeth will be working on her ideas separately. This episode was produced by me and Taylor Dunn. It…

Speaker names come from our own diarization. The position is estimated from where the line sits in the episode.

Collections They Appear In