Connect your Claude, Codex or OpenClaw for full transcripts on millions of podcasts. Two week free trial, cancel anytime.
Start free trial →Prof G Markets · Money & Markets · November 2026
Ed Elson asked what open source actually means in AI and how it differs from closed. Laskin, CEO of Reflection, answers with a rent-versus-own analogy. It frames the whole open-weight debate as a question of control.
…And it's extremely important for America as a country to be competitive and not just competitive, but have the best open source software and models when it comes to AI and ensure that our allies that the world and domestically, we all build on our own open intelligence. So we saw that coming.
Can I just interrupt for one moment? What actually is what does open source mean? What does it mean to be an open model? When you describe Linux, which is open source, what is the difference between open source versus closed source?
The high-level distinction, closed, you cannot own. You can only rent. Open, you can own entirely. So it's kind of like the difference between the rental and the ownership real estate market. When you are renting an apartment, you don't actually own it, right? You are subject to the whims of your landlord, which could mean price hikes. It could mean an eviction. It could mean all sorts of things, but it's very convenient. You just pay rent and someone else manages your property for you. You don't really have to worry about fixing the, you know, when the pipes are leaking or something like that, right? You call, you ask your landlord and they figure it out. On the other hand, in real estate, there's the ownership market, right, which is you buy a house…
My understanding, which I don't think fully aligns with the analogy, is that an element of open source and the open models is that they're free. It's, I mean, when you buy a home and you own a home, you've got to pay money to buy the home. But with open source models, my understanding is anyone can…
No, I think you're right. But it's kind of like, what would be the analogy here? The model may be free, even though some models choose to license. So you can have an open model that someone can own that has a license attached to it, right? And that's, you know, Meta's latest model, Muse, has a…
Would it make sense then to say that for the open, the open models, and one thing I'll also would be helpful as a clarification on the difference between open weight and open source? Open weight is the new terminology that we are hearing in the AI world. And it's not totally clear what the…