“As long as you've created a permission structure to go after people that you disagree with based on your belief that their ideology is dangerous, then anybody can use that same template to go after a different group of people. So while this was used against the left, four years or five years from now, it could easily be used against the right.”

…an undisputed act of violence, that allowed the government to basically say, well, see, they are terrorists. See, they are violent. Here's political violence. Let's charge them all as violent terrorists. And where that makes bad law is that if it is not somehow overturned in an appeals court, which at the moment it's very uncertain what will happen, that bad law can be applied to anybody. So as long as you've created a permission structure to go after people that you disagree with based on your belief that their ideology is dangerous, then anybody can use that same template to go after a different group of people. So while this was used against the left, four years or five years from now, it could easily be used against the right. This is the kind of case that January 6th, arguably, based on everything that occurred, could easily be called a terrorist incident. There were a million things that people did on January 6th that qualified, but they weren't charged in that matter. And they actually wanted. Walked out of prison after a very short amount of time. But if there's something similar like that happened in another…