“A lot of the cyber issues that we've seen in the last six months or so could have been addressed with better engineering, more robust engineering. You need really amazing monitoring systems. It shouldn't be possible for agents to be running for weeks without anyone realizing. … Some kind of incident, I sometimes call it an oil spill, is going to happen on the current trajectory if we don't get it collectively, if everyone doesn't pay a lot more attention and put a lot more resources on these types of systems.”

Well, what we're doing, and I think other leading labs are trying to do, is you've got to, so there's more prosaic things like make sure cyber defense is accelerating faster than cyber attack and making sure you give access to trusted cyber defenders first on maybe slightly fine-tuned versions of your general models that are fine-tuned for cyber defense. And so you keep the defenders ahead of the attackers. It's a pretty tricky problem to do in general. Also building much more hardened sandboxes. I think a lot of the cyber kind of issues that we've seen in the last six months or so could have been addressed with better engineering, more robust engineering. I think better, you need really amazing monitoring systems. You know, they shouldn't be possible for agents to be running for weeks without anyone realizing. You know, these kinds of things that we've seen some of our some of our competitors and others, maybe, you know, it's just the beginning of this happening. So I think everyone will get rapidly better, but they have to as well, because otherwise something bad is going to happen inadvertently. Some kind of incident, you know, I sometimes call it like an oil spill is going to happen on the current trajectory if we're not, if we don't get it collectively, if everyone doesn't pay a lot more…