“People often note that interns are not that useful. They need many months of experience before they are useful to the company. And these AI systems are in a position where they are beginning every single session as if this is their first day on the job.”

…they're often described as AGI. AGI, I mean, as AIs that can do any end-to-end. Job that humans can do, all the cognitive work. In my opinion, we're far from AGI. And I've been articulating or trying to articulate for the last year or two the kinds of cognitive limitations these systems have, which make them far inferior to humans at most jobs, even most jobs that can be done over a computer. People often note that interns are not that useful. They need many months of experience before they are useful to the company. And these AI systems are in a position where they are beginning every single session as if this is their first day on the job. So this is one important missing limitation. There are many others that these AI systems have, but we have been cracking through countless half a dozen other limitations that AIs have over the last five, 10 years. Five years ago, AIs couldn't add two plus two, right? Now they're solving Navier-Stokes. And so I think that as we keep going through these limitations, people should expect systems…