“It is totally true with Claude, or any of them, any of even the most advanced ones. It is so bad at stuff that I'm good at. So why do I think it's so good at stuff I'm bad at? Because I can't tell the difference.”

And I was like, I didn't get the, I think, I think it's Gelman amnesia. I don't remember the exact name. I didn't get Gelman amnesia. I never trusted the newspaper again. But most people are like, oh, this one article in the newspaper I'm reading that I know a lot about is totally wrong. It's completely, or at least it's 101 level, simplistic stupidness. But all these other articles are expert level genius articles that don't have typos or don't have the names wrong or don't have a correction in tomorrow's edition, which I'll never see anyway. And I mean, when you're on a daily deadline, and I'm from a newspaper family, a lot of stuff's wrong. But anyway, that's the, that's the, I think that was the original use case, but it's the exact same thing or the original impetus for that study was newspapers. But now it's, it is totally true with Claude and or any of them, any of even the most advanced ones. It is so bad at stuff that I'm good at. Yeah. So why is it, why do I think it's so good at stuff…