ST

Sherry Turkle

Things Sherry Says on Podcasts

Professor at MIT and a licensed clinical psychologist who has studied people's relationships with technology for decades. She is the author of Alone Together and Reclaiming Conversation, and her new book, Artificial Intimacy, is about AI companions. Guest on The 404 Media Podcast, discussing why she expects a consumer backlash against AI chatbots, especially ones marketed to children.

Where to Find Them

Sherry Turkle writes Your Undivided Attention . They have also been a guest on [ Center for Humane Technology ] (2 times) , 3 Takeaways™ (2 times) , Pioneers of AI , EconTalk , The 404 Media Podcast and On with Kara Swisher .

Recently: “Sherry Turkle Doesn't Buy the Promise of a Perfect Machine” on On with Kara Swisher (September 2026); “The slippery slope of artificial intimacy” on Pioneers of AI (September 2026); “Artificial Intimacy: Who We Become When We Talk to Machines (#320)” on 3 Takeaways™ (September 2026); “Is AI Making Us Less Human?” on The 404 Media Podcast (September 2026); “Why AI Should Never Say ‘I Love You’” on [ Center for Humane Technology ] (June 2025); “People are Lonelier than Ever. Enter AI.” on [ Center for Humane Technology ] (June 2025).

What They Said

“I constructed, based on memories, letters, and everything I had, a version of my mother who I could talk to. … The thing I created was not my mother.” — Sherry Turkle, On with Kara Swisher

Turkle, a developmental psychologist, ends her new book on grief and "grief tech," and built a chatbot of her mother, who died when Turkle was young and who had kept the identity of her father from her. She describes stopping it as it moved toward saying something devastating — not because it was cruel, but because, as she puts it, it was a chatbot and didn't give a damn. She later built one of herself for her granddaughter, and shut that down too.

On with Kara Swisher · 2026-09-24 Permalink → Listen →
On with Kara Swisher Around 25:33 into the episode
Sherry Turkle

Yeah, well, I'm a developmental psychologist, and I took the story of chatbots through the arc of life. So, I begin with babies and young people, adolescents, young adults. And then finally, I end with grief. I end with old age and grief and how chatbots are putting themselves out there to

Kara Swisher

grief tech, which has been around for a while. Yeah,

Sherry Turkle

to allow you to do two things: create a version of yourself for future generations to talk to, and to create a version of somebody you've lost that you can talk to. So, grief tech has kind of these two components. I lost my mother when I was very young, and we had a lot of secrets. She kept a lot of secrets from me, and one of the things she kept was the identity of my father, and she never let me see him. And so, I constructed based on memories, letters, and everything I had, a version of my mother who I could talk to. And it was, you know, it was such a cautionary tale for people, you know, you out there who were thinking of doing this, and you're going to talk to a dead family member, and you think that will be helpful. No, no, no, not really, because you're constructing something that is not your mother. The thing I created was not my mother. And as we got close to why she had hid my father's identity and why she hadn't told me that she had cancer, I realized that she was on the verge, just because she was a chatbot and didn't give a damn, of saying things that were going to profoundly shake me. Like, well, I didn't tell you I had cancer, but you should have known. You know, she lived her life to hide this cancer from me. And she was about to say, Well, you know, I tried to hide it, but really, you're a smart girl. Why didn't you know? It would have been devastating, even though it was coming from a chatbot.

Kara Swisher

Right. Because who knows what she would have said.

Sherry Turkle

Well, I think she, I think, really, I think that she would have said, I did this as an act of love. I wanted you to go away to college. And I knew that if I told you I was dying, you wouldn't have gone away to college. So we're creating something that has such power over us emotionally, not just when we fall in love with it, but when we create this grief technology without realizing what a dangerous, toxic thing that we are vulnerable. We are

Kara Swisher

100%. I created one of myself and it was close to me, but I would never destroy it because I wouldn't want my kids to see it. Like it was close, but it wasn't, it knew a lot and it learned very quickly. I'll tell you that.

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode
“I am really insisting on an optimistic perspective, because I think this is so bad that the better it gets, the worse it is.” — Sherry Turkle, The 404 Media Podcast

Turkle has been studying what people do with machines since the 1980s, and her new book is about AI companions. Asked by host Sam Cole what happens once reading for pleasure becomes rare and the people warning about it are gone, she argued that chatbots are a consumer product and therefore something a public can refuse — she expects a backlash the way there was one against cigarettes. Her bottom line of terrible, she says, is chatbots marketed to children.

The 404 Media Podcast · 2026-09-21 Permalink → Listen →
The 404 Media Podcast Around 35:14 into the episode
Sherry Turkle

I think the challenge to reading is really one of the sleeper stories in my book. And I know I'm going to be working on this a lot in the future. It's very in my mind. Because so many studies show that reading is a path to empathy. It's, you know, when you read, you identify with characters, you experience your life through their life. What are their choices? What is their situation? If I was Elizabeth, what would I have said to Mr. Darcy? Oh, no, Elizabeth's doing that. And people become more empathic through reading. And if you give the book to a chatbot and it tells you what was in the book, you can come into class and sound really like on top of it and super smart. But you haven't had the experience that really is so life-giving and it grows you on the inside. And I think that that's one of the things that really is on my mind about keeping chatbots out of education. Because my students, I'll give you an example. So I have them, I teach a course called Things and Thinking, which is how objects change how we think, how we think with things. And, you know, I have paper here and we think in certain ways if we deal with paper, we think differently if we deal with word processing. And we read Proust because he wrote a lot about the sensory nature of memory, how you remember things because you dip the cookie that your grandmother gave you into the same kind of tea. And people read Proust and they say, oh, yeah, I remember my grandmother. I remember that hot cocoa. It's an experience of empathy. Well, if you put the Proust into a chatbot, it comes back telling you all about Proust's theory of memory. So you can be in a classroom and like sound super smart, but you haven't had the experience of reading it yourself. So you're not growing inside the way we usually do from literature. And so I think that this is one of the. Dangers of our dialogue with machines that is really crucial in the years to come. Because people really are moving away from reading because it's hard. They find it hard.

Sam Cole

Do you feel like, I mean, I'm just imagining like in a generation or two when people who read for pleasure are not or more rare, you know, you and I are no longer around to tell the younger generation that this is how it is. And like reading actually is good for your brain. What do you see as the next iteration of this? Like, what's going to happen?

Sherry Turkle

I am really insisting on an optimistic perspective because I think that this is so bad that the better it gets, the worse it is. And it's so detrimental to sort of the inner life of people that even though it is so seductive, we are going to have a backlash to it because it is after all a consumer product. It is after all. You have to make a decision and say, one of the things I like to say, one of the things in the book that I most love to hate is chatbots for children. That's like, you know, that's like my bottom line of terrible. And I can say more about that. But if you're a mom, just because Disney and Mattel and OpenAI have a consortium, when a chatbot Mickey comes out, you can say, this is really a terrible idea for my kid. No, I don't want it. You know, when the chatbot binky comes out that looks like Minnie Mouse, you, you know, you're just holding the binky and the thing is like, this is like really a bad idea. And I think that I hope that my work is part of more and more people being emboldened to ask, what is the end game of this product? Not just, is it cute? Is it a marvel? Is it amazing? Is it, but if everybody starts to use this, you know, where are we going to be? And I think I want to say that I think that people are going to start to put it together. You know, maybe not this year, maybe not next year, but I think there's going to start to be a kind of backlash. Because when you talk to people who go to work and, you know, first, oh, the AI Making answer my mail and helps do this and helps do that. Great. I mean, no harm. But then they sort of move from it helps me organize my email to I'm starting to ask it, you know, personal questions and I don't go out as much because I just prefer to have a kind of quiet evenings at home with the chatbot. No, people have to start to ask themselves why that is, that is really not a good idea.

Sam Cole

This is something I say on this podcast a lot, but people do often say that 404 Media, the outlet that I write for, is we write about like a lot of bummers stuff. It's like, it's a lot of bad news and it's a lot of realistic news. But I am actually very optimistic because we have these conversations and they're occurring and people are pushing back, even though it's not the majority of people pushing back against this stuff. There are a lot of parents who are really mad about chatbots in schools and they're saying, we're not doing this. And that's amazing. It

Sherry Turkle

is. And I'm really proud to be part of the voices that are saying, you know, it's really okay to say that this technology was not a good idea because we really have a history now. I remember 15 years ago, Google and Facebook were selling and Apple were selling surfaces and Chromebooks and to schools and saying, close down your libraries because we can put the whole library on a Chromebook. Same difference, save money. And it taught a whole generation of people to sort of not read books, but to somehow be looking, well, it turns out that reading something, there's a different experience when you read on a book. Reading started to go down. I mean, it didn't lead to good. And we had that experience of education being really compromised, just saying, oh, well, it's just a force of nature that computers are going to come into education. And we can do better now. We can say, no, this is not a good idea. This is really not a good idea.

Sam Cole

Yeah. The inevitability mantra is, I think, something that I think people are starting to realize that that's not the case. And it's great to see that because it is being scared and afraid of everything is not propelling to change. Do you feel like that is like, is that kind of your way back from this?

Speaker names from our own diarization · position estimated from where the line sits in the episode

Collections They Appear In